Uncanny Spider-Man #2 annotations
As always, this post contains spoilers, and page numbers go by the digital edition.
UNCANNY SPIDER-MAN #2
“Blue Streak”
Writer: Si Spurrier
Artist: Lee Garbett
Colour artist: Matt Milla
Letterer: Joe Caramagna
Design: Tom Muller & Jay Bowen
Editor: Sarah Brunstad
COVER / PAGE 1. Nightcrawler fights the Rhino.
PAGES 2-3. Nightcrawler and Mystique.
We saw Mystique last issue, wandering around Central Park mostly in the form of a homeless person. Since Nightcrawler says they’ve had several previous encounters, this presumably isn’t an immediate continuation from the previous issue. Mystique suffered an aneurysm in X-Men: Hellfire Gala 2023 while resisting Professor X’s attempt to force her through the gates, which is why she’s incoherent here – although how she made it back to Central Park in this condition is unclear. It’s surely not a coincidence that she wound up in the same place as her son Nightcrawler.
Mystique is referring – in a rather rambling way – to Nightcrawler’s origin story. This area of continuity is a mess, with multiple versions of the story that slightly contradict each other.
- In X-Men Unlimited #4 (1994), Graydon Creed recounts the version of the story known to him. According to Graydon, Mystique “was the widow of a recently deceased German count”, who she may have killed; she was living with him simply for the money. Her cover was blown when she gave birth to Kurt. Some sort of mob – Graydon calls them “the royal family” – tries to kill Kurt. Raven changes to her original form to scare them and tries to escape with Kurt. She drops Kurt at a waterfall and flees to save herself. The mob then throw Kurt over a waterfall. All of this, of course, is hearsay. Later in the issue, Mystique gives her version, which broadly matches Graydon’s. She claims that she disguised herself as the villager and threw Kurt over the cliff in order to cover her own escape. This was not a very well received story when it came out.
- Uncanny Origins #8 (1997) basically repeats this version, though a little more sympathetically to Raven, with more emphasis on the idea that the mob were going to kill both her and Kurt anyway.
- In Uncanny X-Men #428 (2003), Chuck Austen spends an entire issue on a much expanded version. This account is basically consistent with X-Men Unlimited #4, though it names the Count as Christian Wagner and establishes that Raven was living with him under her real name. They were supposedly trying to have a child, and Christian was apparently infertile. Christian introduces her to Azazel, then posing as a ruler of a Caribbean island, who somehow knows that she’s a mutant, and seduces her as part of his plan to have lots of children on Earth (for reasons connected with the plot of “The Draco”). Raven murders Christian because he suspects Azazel of being the father. Kurt is born, and Raven lapses into her true appearance during the birth. A torch-wielding mob pursues her, and in this version Raven herself throws the baby off a cliff before making her escape. Austen is clearly aware of X-Men Unlimited #4 but makes no attempt to suggest that Raven has any agenda in living with Christian beyond his wealth, and doesn’t attempt to explain how Destiny fits in to any of this. In fairness to Austen, Destiny had been dead for years at this point. Austen’s version of the waterfall scene contradicts the earlier versions, showing Raven in her natural form and with no pretext that she’s posing as a villager. She’s just trying to kill Kurt.
- The 2010 one-shot X-Men Origins: Nightcrawler skips directly to Kurt working in a German circus, and reduces this entire sequence to a one-page flashback. It simply shows Raven fleeing the torch-wielding mob with baby Kurt, and collapsing unconscious next to a river. Kurt is then swept away by the current, rather than being deliberately thrown over the waterfall by anyone. The canonical status of the X-Men Origins one-shots is a bit dubious anyway.
Raven says here that “I went back for something in the castle.” So far as I’m aware, this doesn’t happen in any previous version of the story, which suggests that Spurrier may be intending to actually do something about this storyline beyond merely acknowledging its existence. The whole thing has generally been treated by later writers as best ignored, though not worth the hassle of actually undoing.
It may be worth mentioning that Austen’s version provides a back door in which Kurt’s father could also be just a random local who Mystique seduces at the start of the story while posing as a maid – or even Christian himself. That would be the simplest way of detaching Kurt from Azazel, if you really wanted to. Admittedly, the plot of “The Draco” hinges on Kurt being Azazel’s son, but you can handwave a lot away when magic is concerned. And besides, the plot of “The Draco” never made any sense in the first place.
PAGES 4-6. Nightcrawler talks with Dagger.
We saw the “angel Kurt” talking to Kurt last issue, but we’re given no real further cues about what it is.
We haven’t seen Cloak & Dagger in a while – they’ve been pretty quiet over the last few years beyond showing up in crossover events. When Dagger says that they’ve been “X-adjacent their whole lives”, this is more of a meta comment. Their original back story, which is also their current back story, involved them getting powers from experimental drugs. Don’t do drugs, kids! However, they did appear quite prominently in New Mutants, and for a while they were retconned into being latent mutants whose powers had been activated by the drugs. Their late 80s series was actually called The Mutant Misadventures of Cloak & Dagger, and they were briefly members of the X-Men (in an extended-family sort of way) during the Utopia era.
Kurt has correctly guessed what happened to Mystique (or at least seems to have happened to her).
“Come by Jarvis’s some night, huh?” Dagger means the Jarvis Lounge, a superhero community bar owned by the Wasp (Janet van Dyne) and named after the Avengers’ long-standing butler.
PAGE 7. The Rhino attacks.
Once again, the Rhino is a Spider-Man villain on loan to the X-books. He’s mainly just a general big strong guy who’s been around for years and has high recognisability, if we’re being honest. This Orchis themed costume is not his normal one, and we’ll find out more about it later. Rhino was actually seen hanging out at one of Gambit’s poker games in X-Men vol 6 #2.
PAGE 8. Recap and credits.
PAGES 9-10. Silver Sable and an Orchis agent watch Nightcrawler fight Rhino.
Supervisor Toomes is the Vulture, who we saw working for Orchis last issue. He was working on turning mutants into Hounds, but seemed to be up to something involving techno-organics. The agent with Silver Sable is Wilson Travers Jr, who we saw talking to Toomes last issue.
“That Boy Scout killed six world leaders with his bare hands.” While under Orchis’s control in X-Men: Before the Fall – Sons of X #1.
“The Rhino I know is an intellectually subnormal knuckle…” Silver Sable is exaggerating a bit. Normally, he’s written as well below average intelligence, but no more than that. At any rate, she has grudgingly agreed to test the Rhino as somebody who can lure out Nightcrawler. As far as she’s concerned, this is just an excuse to observe Nightcrawler in action before making the real attempt to capture him later on. Sable presumably believes at this point that she’s working for a more-or-less above board organisation, and she figures out for herself that the Rhino is wearing the same control headgear as Nightcrawler had when he was an Orchis asset.
The headgear isn’t exactly prominent in Sons of X, but it is shown, and we specifically see Legion removing it when he rescues Kurt.
PAGE 11. Data page. Travers is given the full name Wilson Travers Jr, and his father is said to be “a noted physicist (who counted Stark, AIM and Roxxon among his employers). This would seem to be Wilson Travers, a random Stark employee who helped to take the remains of F.A.U.S.T. to Asgard in Thor #273. I suspect it’s just a case of picking a random scientist from the usual sources, since it seems unlikely that anything turns on that particular story.
The “Current Status” section confirms that Vulture is indeed experimenting on the “stolen alien Technarch sourcecode” – i.e., presumably Warlock, who was absorbed by Nimrod in Legion of X #10.
The anonymised subject references are just the initials of real names followed by codenames: KW/NC is Kurt Wagner/Nightcrawler, and AS/R is Alexei Sytsevich/Rhino.
PAGE 12. Silver Sable confronts Travers.
Sable wasn’t told that Orchis were using mind control technology… but she’s not exactly losing much sleep over it either. More fundamentally, she doesn’t trust Travers an inch.
PAGES 13-16. Kremer goes against orders and tries to capture Nightcrawler.
Kremer got some dialogue last issue to establish him as an anti-mutant thug. Frankly, the fact that he’s made it this far in Sable’s organisation is a poor reflection on her HR functions. Anyway, it all goes wrong because Kremer didn’t anticipate the Hopesword, but Silver Sable subdues Nightcrawler anyway, because she’s talented.
PAGES 17-21. Nightcrawler and Silver Sable escape underground.
Sable has lost control of Rhino and her men, it seems. So Nightcrawler gets them to safety underground.
Sable mentioned last issue that she thought Kurt was cute. Even so, her behaviour towards him when she gets close is out of character, and she recognises it. Not unreasonably, she assumes some sort of mind control or pheromone power, but as Nightcrawler says, he’s not supposed to have either.
PAGES 22-23. Nightcrawler teleports Rhino above ground.
Nightcrawler is hoping not just to free Rhino of his mind control device, but to keep it as evidence that could exonerate him of the killings he committed under Orchis control in Sons of X #1. The “angel” voice quite reasonably argues that nobody will care.
PAGE 24. Trailers. The Krakoan reads SUPERPOSITIONAL.
Re: Silver Sable’s description of Rhino- Rhino nearly killed her and left her bedridden for months while her ex-husband nursed her back to health- she’s not objective where Rhino is concerned.
Spurrier seems to be suggesting that Mystique had a more sympathetic reason for abandoning Kurt. I don’t know why he’s doing so. Spurrier himself said that Arthur made a monster out of Mordred. If that’s true, then it’s equally true that Mystique made a monster out of Graydon Creed.
The Mystique stuff here is set-up for the X-Men Men Blue Origins oneshot that’s coming out soon-ish. It’s written by Spurrier and it’s advertised as the definite Nightcrawler origin story.
Also it has Mystique and Kurt-as-Spider-Man on the cover.
The Rhino’s intelligence is something that has varied a lot. At one point there was an in-story explanation: a Flowers for Algernon rip-off which ended with him deciding being a genius didn’t make him happy and asking to be made even thicker than he was to start with.
Then after that, in The Gauntlet, Joe Kelly portrayed him as a fairly intelligent guy who’d realised the emptiness of a live spent smashing things with his head, sought something more, and then lost it. Since then, I think he’s generally been portrayed as someone who keeps getting sucked into the role of “dumb muscle” against his will, but isn’t really.
How did Kurt get the last name Wagner? If Mystique threw him over a water fall right after he was born, than Margali would of had no idea what his name was or that he was the abandon son of Count Wagner, when she found him. One would assume Margali than named him herself, so shouldn’t his last name be Szardos?
It’s actually the X-Men Origins story which explains the Wagner surname away, so they should probably treat it as canon just due to that aspect.
In that story, Kurt does go by the name of Kurt Szardos, until he was forced to flee the circus. Kurt hid in a Catholic church and the priest, coincidentally, just happened to be named Wagner. Kurt decided to take the name of the kindly priest who was willing to help him.
And Austin’s Draco arc mentions that Margali knew Azazel, so presumably he told her about Count Wagner.
As creepy as the Kurt/Amanda Sefton thing already is, it’s even more so if he was even named Szardos…
@Daibhid C.
And before Flowers for Rhino, there was a previous story also about him gaining super-intelligence from a sci-fi procedure in Waid and Kubert’s Ka-Zar run. So it’s actually happened to him twice.
I like the real reason he’s named Wagner. Len Wein needed a foreign sounding name that wasn’t so foreign people wouldn’t be able to pronounce it. So he picked a real-life famous guy from that country and used his name. Same goes for Rasputin.
Hopefully, X-Men Blue: Origins #1 from Si Spurrier and Wilton Santos coming out next month will definitely explain Nightcrawler’s convoluted origin and past.
Well, Claremont did have Mystique tell Kurt to ask Margali about why Mystique and Kurt looked similar…so who knows what CC had in mind for explaining how Kurt ended up with Margali. He did reveal he did intend for Mystique/Mystique and Destiny to be Kurt’s bio parents, but not mention how Kurt ended up with the Wagner name, did he?
Could someone say more about the reception at the time to X-Men Unlimited #4?
@Dan K- it was INCREDIBLY negative.Some of it was deserved- Rogue’s choice at the end of the story made no sense since she should have been able to save both Kurt and Mystique. But a lot of it was over the top. Part of it might have to do with the fact that readers were disappointed that Claremont’s idea that Mystique was fathered by Kurt when she was shapeshifting into a man wasn’t used. Lobdell thought that was weird but he also thought that it made no sense since Mystique’s shapeshifting was written as very limited at the time. (She never became any stronger when she changed into sometime stronger than her. One time, when she changed into Nick Fury, she implied she couldn’t change into someone much taller than him. Another time, Madelyne Pryor tied up with a rope- an ordinary rope, not a magical or power-dampening rope- and she couldn’t use her shape shifting powers to escape.)
@Michael: Thank you! That’s helpful.
[…] took my baby – here, in these endless forests of Bavaria”. As in the last issue, Mystique is rambling about Nightcrawler’s origin story. Again, she seems to be alluding to a version of events that contradicts previous accounts, and […]
[…] that established continuity has Mystique abandoning him, rather than having him taken from her (as covered in the annotations for issue #2). She doesn’t give him a direct answer to that point, instead choosing to tell him that […]