RSS Feed
Sep 23

The X-Axis – w/c 18 September 2023

Posted on Saturday, September 23, 2023 by Paul in x-axis

X-MEN UNLIMITED INFINITY COMIC #105. By Steve Foxe, Stephanie Williams, Noemi Vettori, Pete Pantazis & Travis Lanham. This is another ludicrously overloaded week from the X-office. Which means it’s probably not the best week to be listening to the opinions of completists like me, or at least it’s best to attach a caveat to them, since anyone reading all of these books would have to be absolutely rabid in order to get to the end of the pile without, at some point, thinking “Oh god, is there still more?” To be fair, Uncanny Spider-Man #1 is running two weeks late. But the planned schedule always had eight comics, which is ridiculous.

X-Men Unlimited Infinity Comic has the good fortune to come out first. It completes the series of spotlight stories for the members of the X-Men team who got annihilated at the Hellfire Gala. This is Juggernaut’s story, and it’s basically people recapping his history and talking about his journey of atonement. But it seems to be trying to present election to the X-Men as the climax of that journey, which runs up against the problem that he joined the X-Men during the Chuck Austen run, something like fifteen years ago now. I suppose you can argue that being voted onto the team carries more weight, though. And if you’re willing to wave that point through, then it’s a nice enough recap of Juggernaut’s career, but it’s not much more than that.

ALPHA FLIGHT #2. By Ed Brisson, Scott Godlewski, Matt Milla & Travis Lanham. So, yeah, I’m not going to do annotations for Alpha Flight and Uncanny Avengers, because life’s too short. Besides, Alpha Flight is a proper Alpha Flight book, built around a recognisable Alpha Flight team playing along with an anti-mutant Canadian government in order to help refugees from within. Like all the “Fall of X” books that focus on the actual persecution of the mutants – rather than the exile thread, or stories which are enabled by the mutants being largely absent – it suffers from the fact that the Orchis angle is too heavy handed. Within its parameters, Brisson handles it well, and the art is nice in a classic superhero way, but at this stage… yeah, I don’t accept the premise of the story, and it’s pretty clear by this point that you’re not going to win me round to it.

UNCANNY AVENGERS #2. By Gerry Duggan, Javier Garrón, Morry Hollowell & Travis Lanham. See above, except I don’t even think this one is particularly well done within the ambit of the story. The closer “Fall of X” gets to the Orchis storyline, the more boring I find it, and unfortunately Gerry Duggan’s books are the motherlode for that thread.  Nothing against Duggan – his Marauders was the best thing in the first year of the Krakoan era – but this is stuff is absolutely dying on the vine for me.

DARK X-MEN #2. (Annotations here.) On the other hand, this is much better. Orchis are the villains, but Dark X-Men is more interested in a different angle – it’s a storyline enabled by the fact that all the regular mutants are off the board, leaving Madelyne Pryor to lay claim to the X-Men name and do it a wonky, distorted way. The cover is terrible, but the interior art is much better, and the book strikes a nice balance between its elements. A straightforward story of Madelyne leading a bunch of villains who are indulging her delusion that she’s running the X-Men would have worked. But the approach here – where she’s got a deluded Havok by her side, and a few actually sane characters to round out the team and make it kind-of-sort-of the X-Men for real – is a much more interesting balance. Even Azazel is quite entertaining, perhaps because the main problem with Azazel is the damage he does to Nightcrawler’s back story, and none of that is relevant here. Azazel as a dark Nightcrawler hanging out with Madelyne’s group for survival reasons, and acting amused by the whole thing, is perfectly fine. This book has been one of the pleasant surprises of “Fall of X.”

WOLVERINE #37. (Annotations here.) Wolverine hunts down his three missing clones, with the help of guest star the Hulk. This is another story written in the margins of “Fall of X” – it pays lip service to that arc, and works it into Wolverine’s motivations, but none of that really matters. The story is really an excuse to take Logan to visit three formative locations from his past, with each of the clones representing a distorted version of his persona there. I wasn’t expecting the book to bash through all three of them in a single issue – albeit an extra length one – but it’s a good call from a pacing standpoint.

I said in the annotations that there was only one bit of it that didn’t really make sense to me, which is Solem putting his Patch clone on display at the very same time as he’s explaining why he’s keeping the clone in the shadows. I still don’t think that bit works. In fact, there’s quite a lot that doesn’t make sense in a purely logical way – if the clones are all supposed to be dumb as rocks, how the hell did they manage to find their way back to these locations in the first place, starting from the other side of the world? Especially without getting picked off by Sentinels? But that’s the sort of thing I’m willing to wave through, because there’s a kind of fable logic going on here. Hulk is a bit of an arbitrary inclusion, but he works as a foil for Logan, and he kind of fits with the theme of revisiting Logan’s roots. Pretty good.

UNCANNY SPIDER-MAN #1. (Annotations here.) Another “Fall of X” book that does work, because it’s really a story about Nightcrawler being separated from everyone else and trying to find a new direction after Legion of X. Or rather, ostensibly trying to find a new direction, but actually just hanging around a park and beating up the odd mugger. It’s hard to imagine that Nightcrawler really thinks he’s fooling anyone with this Spider-Man costume, but the design looks great, and his efforts to be a light-hearted Spider-hero cut nicely against the bleakness of the “Fall of X” elements. I assume the voice of the sword is going to turn out to be Legion, given the accent and, well, the fact that this is obviously a continuation of Legion of X. Picking up Mystique’s storyline seems a good fit. But mainly, it’s a nice little character book, which benefits from being more focussed than Legion of X. In that series, a ton of ideas seemed to be battling for space – Uncanny Spider-Man is much less crowded, and all the better for it.

X-MEN ANNUAL #1. By Paul Allor, Alessandro Miracolo, Annalisa Leoni & Clayton Cowles. We had an X-Men Annual #1 last year, you know. During the same run of X-Men. If you don’t want to stick numbers on them, can we at least go with years so that we might be able to tell them apart in future? Have you people ever tried finding one of these old annuals on Marvel Unlimited? Putting #1 on literally everything irks me, not so much because it doesn’t make sense, as because it reeks of autopilot. Do you seriously think anyone is more likely to buy the 2023 X-Men Annual because it has a #1 on it? Especially when it’s part 7 of a crossover?

Yes, this is part of “Contest of Chaos”, a crossover which I haven’t been reading, and seems to be not much more than “they fight.” In this issue, set before “Fall of X”, Captain Marvel and Cyclops: they fight. It’s alright, as these things go? The art’s pretty. Some of the action is quite inventive. I’ve seen this sort of thing done far worse, but it’s still just a random fight scene at the end of the day. Maybe it’s less pointless if you’ve read the rest of the crossover, but it doesn’t do anything to sell me on doing so. A week with eight other X-books out was not the best time to put out this sort of filler.

DEADPOOL: BADDER BLOOD #4. By Rob Liefeld, Chad Bowers, Cory Hamscher, Chance Wolf & Jay David Ramos. And to think, issue #1 exceeded expectations. This doesn’t – it really has just descended into endless random fight scenes, to which Marvel can fairly say “What did you expect?” and I can reflect on my choices in life.

PREDATOR VERSUS WOLVERINE #1. By Benjamin Percy, Ken Lashley, Greg Land, Jay Leisten, Andrea Di Vito, Juan Fernandez, Frank D’Armata. Madly expensive, but to be fair, it’s 43 pages long. Oddly, this seems to be written as if it’s canon – the basic format is “Logan fights the Predator at assorted points in his career”. There are different artists for each era, with this first issue focussing on the post- Origin period – which, as per X Lives of Wolverine, now has an opening where Logan is lucid. That segment is drawn by Greg Land, but this is quite a smart use of him, since despite the usual manically grinning minor characters, the script forces him to draw things like snowbound landscapes and animals that steer him into doing some of his better work. Well, until the Predator shows up. He looks like a 14-year-old at a costume party. The basic concept is maybe too similar to X Lives of Wolverine. But if it’s playing the hits, it does it well, and Wolverine works in a predator-prey role reversal story. Traditionally that’s Sabretooth’s role, but he’s otherwise occupied and we haven’t done that particular story in many years, so this is better than you might expect.

 

 

 

Bring on the comments

  1. Michael says:

    At least X-Men Unlimited 105 confirmed Sammy Squidboy was resurrected.
    I’m not liking that Alpha Flight agreed to turn the actually evil mutants over to Orchis so they could save the “good” ones. Especially since we saw what Orchis did to Scott and Warren.
    So who do we think Captain Krakoa is? That remark about how America’s leaders are intent on giving our inheritance away to trespassers sounded like Burnside to me. (I don’t think it’s Nuke, despite the flashback to Born Again- he was never a captain and he’s too unstable to lead a group like the MLF.)
    I know Blog is stupid but still thinking Captain Krakoa is Cyclops after Captain Krakoa tried to kill Monet is stupid even for him.
    I like Stasis and MODOK realizing that recruiting a right-wing extremist, having him work with a female Nazi and help them steal a nuke might not have been the best plan.
    Wade seems to see himself as the fool who speaks the truth. So Rogue, it might be a good idea to warn him of Destiny’s prediction that “The fool who speaks the truth will pay the price”. (Seriously, did Rogue bother to share ANY of Destiny’s prophecies with the other Avengers?)
    Waid refers to the X-Men losing “several Infernos”. What does he mean by that? I mean arguably the first Inferno counts as a a loss because the X-Men didn’t get Maddie back on their side until Dark Web but what are the others? Dark Web might have been a loss for Peter but not for the X-Men. Was Hickman’s Inferno even referred to as an Inferno in-universe? Or maybe I shouldn’t take anything Wade says seriously.

  2. wwk5d says:

    I’m actually enjoying Alpha Flight. It’s not amazing but I’m being entertained so far.

    Uncanny Spider-man was ok. I do find Kurt’s look a bit weird, but overall it’s a solid read so far.

    Dark X-men has been surprisingly good too so far.

    Uncanny Avengers is…well, with X-men, there are some interesting ideas that Duggen has that just aren’t executed all that well.

  3. Mike Loughlin says:

    I liked Uncanny Avengers 1, but issue 2 was pretty meh. Nice art, at least. I can accept the general mediocrity of the Duggan books because the better X-comics make up for them, but am baffled as to why he gets to lead the line right now. Maybe the other writers weren’t interested? He’s been there longer than anyone except Percy, who has his own corner of the X-line to play around in? Editorial likes him? Whatever the reason, I hope he doesn’t completely tank “Fall of X” and the upcoming “Fall of the House of X” by the end of things. At least I have Gillen & Silva on “Rise of the Powers of X” to look forward to.

    Predator vs. Wolverine: like this week’s issue of Wolverine, this was dumb fun. I agree that it’s the least bad Greg Land art I’ve seen in awhile, and am glad the second issue will have less (or no) work by him. Solo Wolverine can be flat, but the Larry Hama formula of over-the-top action and alternately tongue-in-cheek and sincere tough guy dialogue still has legs.

    X-Men Annual: waste of money, despite the decent art. I only bought it because it was in my in-store sub pile and I feel guilty if I put a book I “ordered” back on the shelf (X-Men is on my pull list; next time I’ll add “… but not the Annuals”).

  4. Diana says:

    @Mike: To be fair, the Brits were just coming off Sins of Sinister at the time, and at least two of them (Gillen and Ewing) have talked about being in the back half of their respective runs. Duggan might simply be the one willing to stick around

  5. Mike Loughlin says:

    @Diana: yeah, my impression was the same. I wish Leah Williams and Vita Ayala had stuck around, but realistically Duggan is the last writer standing (minus Percy). I’m thankful we get to read good comics by some newer talents like Foxe and Camp before the end of this era, and the Brits doing stellar work.

  6. JD says:

    Having read all of Contest of Chaos so far… it’s honestly a string of gratuitous fight scenes between heroes, with the gimmick that Agatha Harkness is more-or-less low-key mind-controlling them so that she can pick a bunch of muscle to do… something, which will presumably get clearer in the finale.

    (There’s a token ongoing backup strip with a few characters on her trail, but it’s not like it’s been making much progress either.)

    Technically this had to come out this week because those crossover annuals are being published on a weekly basis, but of course that’s bullshit given that all of those are pretty much interchangeable anyway.

    (And if you think that the #1 is bad, what about the annual for a book that’s not even being published currently, Spider-Gwen ?)

  7. About the numbering thing …

    What really bemuses me is the lack of any disambiguation in footnotes within books. “See Amazing Spider-Man 17 to learn more about that!” If it’s a recent issue, that at least makes it arguably helpful in the era of release without considering posterity. But often the referenced issue isn’t recent and in many cases is from an ended volume of something without a year or even a volume number, and the latter category is often muddled anyway. XD
    Bizarre! To my mind.

  8. Thom H. says:

    The Alpha Flight mini isn’t setting the world on fire, but it’s got a couple of interesting hooks: public team v. stealth team & Who Is Nemesis?!

    Honestly, if it’s just an excuse to get the (mostly) classic team back into rotation, I’m happy with that.

    I love Nightcrawler’s Spider-Man costume. The tail being red only at the tip is a great touch.

  9. Allan M says:

    I am really enjoying Alpha Flight. Good character work, some mysteries, art is solid. But for me, as a Canadian, it’s the thematic stuff that clicks. As I said last month, it’s an allegory to Canadian history, and more generally about being a second-rate power in the shadow of a massive one and having to compromise and use workarounds to do good when the political winds change in the major power.

  10. Brandon says:

    @Mike, thanks for the reminder that X-Factor is no more. That book was so good, might have been my favorite of the entire Krakoa era. Williams did a great job with those characters, everything just flowed

    I enjoyed Uncanny Spider-Man, especially with the dichotomy of Kurt keeping everything inside while displaying the happy-go-lucky to everyone on the outside. I don’t have the knowledge to know if this is a common theme for him, but it feels like it might be.

    Dark X-Men has been an interesting read as well, the big mystery being why Madelyn is doing what she is doing. She seems very interested in Feint, talking her up and pushing her to be more comfortable with her, not sure why though. Looking forward to finding out more.

    Side note: how do I change my image here? The one popping up must be connected to some account I made a while ago.

  11. Luis Dantas says:

    The image is the Gravatar associated to the email address that you use to post here, Brandon. Go to gravatar.com, log in and you should be able to change it.

    Or, altenatively, you may just begin posting with another email address.

  12. Mark Coale says:

    I’d love to see the first Nemesis return. Maybe Deadly Ernest too.

  13. Brandon says:

    @Luis, thanks for the info. My image should be different now, and more indicative of me now, haha.

  14. Brandon says:

    (or not, maybe it needs time to update, haha. thanks anyway!)

  15. Numbering Annuals by year is far too sensible an idea for Marvel.

    (Except for that brief period when they did exactly that.)

Leave a Reply