The X-Axis – 18 April 2010
It’s Sunday afternoon, it’s time to review some comics!
But first… you’ll also be wanting to download this week’s episode of House to Astonish, which you’ll find in the next post down. In this one, Al and I talk about Brightest Day, Kill Shakespeare and Turf. And for those of you who don’t listen all the way to the end, keep an eye out over the next few days when Al and I appear on the next episode of The Thumbcast. We’re doing a panel game based on the BBC radio show Fighting Talk. (Only not about sport, obviously.) Should be fun. We’re recording it on Tuesday, so we’ll let you know when it’s up. Or you could just subscribe to their podcast too. I do.
Next week… well, god knows, really. Theoretically there’s a whole lot of comics out (including two chapters of “Second Coming”, just to prove that Marvel really are the worst schedulers imaginable), but given that Diamond are usually unable to get their heads round a bank holiday, I don’t see them overcoming a volcanic dust cloud. So it may be an involuntary skip week next Sunday. Time will tell.
And now, some comics that came out this last week…
Black Widow #1 – Just to prove that Marvel are nothing if not eternally optimistic, this is a new ongoing series for the perennial C-lister, presumably on the basis that she’s in the upcoming Iron Man movie. Anyone seriously think that’s going to help it get past the year barrier? No, me neither. You know, if it were me, I’d take the “series of miniseries” route with these lower-tier characters. It’s a vicious circle when you start cancelling books after five months, because then readers have even less faith in the next launch (and they’re right to do so). Seems to me that if you call it a mini then you’re probably going to turn out to be right anyway, and you’ll restore some of the lustre of launching something as an Ongoing Series.
Anyway, the comic. It’s by Marjorie Liu and Daniel Acuna, a decent creative team. Despite the silly acres of cleavage on the cover, the interior art has no truck with such nonsense, which is reassuring. It’s one of those stories where Natasha is attacked by baddies with a Mysterious Agenda, who cut something out of her and then leave her for the doctors to deal with. And… actually that’s about the extent of the main plot, but Liu fills it out nicely with good supporting roles for the other Avengers (higher-profile characters who nonetheless don’t overshadow her), some neat interactions between Natasha and the other spy types, and a genuinely nasty, if rather implausible, surgery sequence. Acuna’s art is a good match for the character, who goes well with slightly stylised visuals. And it strikes a decent balance between using other Marvel Universe characters (to appeal to the Wednesday crowd) without letting them dominate the story (and thus alienating all those movie viewers who are theoretically supposed to be buying the book). All told, it’s pretty good. And even if it doesn’t survive for long as an ongoing series, I think it’ll manage to deliver an entertaining few issues with this story.
Brightest Day #0 – See also the podcast. This is the opening issue of DC’s next universe-spanning thingy, running fortnightly for the next few months. A bunch of characters were brought back from the dead at the end of Blackest Night; this series is, well, about them. So it’s an ensemble cast, except the characters have seemingly nothing in common other than being brought back from the dead – it’s a motley crew ranging from the likes of the Martian Manhunter and Maxwell Lord down to Captain Boomerang and Hawk. I can sort of see why they’ve billed this as issue #0 – it’s really about introducing the vast set of characters rather than kicking off the story proper – but it is essential reading and to all intents and purposes it’s issue #1. Much depends here on whether Geoff Johns and Peter Tomasi ultimately have a good explanation for reviving this oddball selection of characters, since that’s the central mystery that has to drive this series. Without that, it risks becoming an exercise in reversing unwanted continuity. There’s also another possibility, which is that the series manages to do something interesting with the whole concept of how the different characters deal with their reincarnation, but that doesn’t exactly seem to be a priority here. Fernando Pasarin’s art is lovely, and I thought this was basically fine as an intro issue. Al wasn’t so sure, to put it mildly.
The Flash #1 – What, another Flash relaunch? Do you think they’ll ever take the hint and put the poor guy on the back burner for a while to let interest build? Probably not, unfortunately; it’s alien to DC’s entire way of thinking about their older characters. So, here’s Geoff Johns and Francis Manapul to kick off another stab at breathing life back into the franchise. Barry Allen returns to Central City (where everyone apparently thinks he’s been in witness protection or something), and picks up his old job as a forensic scientist. Which, yes, is backwards… but it’s also a useful dual identity for plot purposes, so I’ve got no real problems with that. And we’re also back to the old deal where everyone thinks Barry is gifted but incredibly slow, when of course we all know he’s… and so on and so forth. All told, even as someone who’s not particularly familiar with the character’s history, it’s pretty clear that this is a case of a creative team hammering the reset button as hard as they can and hauling the character back to what they regard as a classic status quo. The concession to the passage of time is that Central City has become darker and more disillusioned in Barry’s absence – DO YOU SEE THE SUBTLE METAPHOR? – and so presumably he’s going to be setting the world to rights a bit. But okay, I guess. If you’re going to do the Silver Age throwback routine with anyone, the Flash is a fair choice – his powers lend himself to that sort of story, and he ought to be a shiny, happy hero of the old school. I like the art; Manapul’s got a simple but expressive quality to his work, though it’s unfortunate that he’s chosen to interpret Barry as a square-jawed hero so traditional that, when he’s not in costume, he’s the least interesting thing on the page. As for the story… well, it’s throwback city, like I say. But that seems to be the mood of the industry right now, and to be honest, I don’t have enough investment in any later incarnation of the Flash to have a problem with Johns doing it in this book. For what it is, which is a very old-fashioned superhero book with a slightly modernised sheen, it works quite well. Whether that’s what you want is another matter.
Kill Shakespeare #1 – A miniseries written by Conor McCreery and Anthony Del Col with art by Andy Belanger, in which a bunch of Shakespeare villains try to enlist Hamlet to, well, kill Shakespeare. This has had some mixed reviews. Al and I didn’t mind it; those who knows their Shakespeare say it’s missing the point of the characters. But is it? It’s hard to say; after all, the story has a couple of characters departing from the plot of Hamlet completely unprompted, so perhaps they’re not meant to act quite like the characters from the plays. As I mentioned on the podcast, I have a theory that the characters who want to get rid of Shakespeare are united in being villains from the histories who weren’t actually quite so villainous in real life – Shakespeare had a tendency to take the politically safe option when it came to writing about historical figures who had gone out of favour. A clearer problem is that the characters are decidedly two-dimensional compared to Shakespeare’s versions – though when you’re inviting comparisons to Hamlet, you’re setting the bar ridiculously high to start with. It’s basically League of Extraordinary Gentlemen with Shakespeare characters, though maybe not with the subtlety. And as with Moore’s comic, the question lurking in the background is whether this is just a gimmicky idea, or whether there’s actually a point to be made about the plays. It’s really too early to tell at this point; it could go either way. Certainly a flawed comic, but for all that, I’m genuinely intrigued to see where the creators are going with this odd premise.
New Mutants #12 – Part 3 of the “Second Coming” crossover, and you guessed it, there’s more fighting. In fairness, to preserve the idea that this is indeed an issue of New Mutants, the focus is on Cannonball and the others trying to hold off the Right and stop them from providing reinforcements to the other baddies. And of course, that’s not the focal point of the overall story by any means. But it does at least provide the New Mutants with a story of their own, instead of getting them submerged into the bigger picture. Basically, though, there are still two threads here: everyone chasing after Cable and Hope, and the X-Men starting to realise that some of Scott’s decisions are a bit questionable. It’s not a bad issue – there are some good moments with the New Mutants wavering about whether to obey Scott’s seemingly suicidal attack orders, and a couple of cute ideas such as the bad guys taking out Magik with a “weaponised ritual”. And Ibrahim Roberson’s artwork is pretty good, though his backgrounds are rather generic. The downside is that the story seems to have become completely detached from the real world, so that it’s all about people in costumes hitting one another; and it feels at this point like a diversion grafted on to the “Second Coming” story in order to shoehorn New Mutants into the plot and give it a sales boost. Zeb Wells has written better issues than this, but hey, that’s crossovers for you.
The Pilgrim #1 – This is by Mark Ryan and Mike Grell, and apparently it’s a reprint of a web comic that I’ve never read. It’s a rather frustrating read. The central idea is quite fun: much of the issue introduces the Psimex Research Institute, in which the American military is testing people with psi-powers. The good news is that these subjects actually do have psi-powers – but not very strong ones. They’re meant to be an intelligence unit; in practice, they’re the thought-controllers of paranoid fantasies. Combining that with bureaucratic budget arguments is a nice enough idea. However, it’s topped and tailed with scenes of weird stuff in World War II and Afghanistan which are hard work to decipher. It’s not even always clear which way your eye should go around double-page spreads. The opening section seems to be intentionally cryptic, but the closing sequence just comes across as a mess. There are some major clarity problems here, and I end up with the feeling that deciphering the story is going to be a major headache and more trouble than it’s worth.
The Unwritten #12 – Once again, Mike Carey throws in a single-issue story between arcs. This one has art by Peter Gross, and it’s fantastic. Pauly Bruckner is a bad, bad man. He tried to take Wilson Taylor’s map, and ended up being condemned to the world of fiction. Specifically, he’s now a bunny in Eliza Mae Hertford’s Willowbank Tales, a sort of halfway house between Winnie the Pooh and Beatrix Potter. And boy, he’s not happy about that. In this issue, we join Mr Bun as he tries to escape life as a stuffed rabbit, while the other woodland folk try their best to help him fit in. It’s a simple idea, it’s very funny, and it’s got a clever pay-off to boot. Easily the best comic I’ve read in weeks, and worth picking up even if you have no interest in the wider series at all. Simply excellent.
X-Factor Forever #2 – “For six years, writer Louise Simonson steered the course for Charles Xavier’s first class of X-Men in their adventures as X-Factor. Now the legendary scribe returns to the mutants she made famous for their most daring adventure yet.” Marvel Comics: never knowingly underhyped.
Now, that said, I liked Louise Simonson’s run on X-Factor, and for largely nostalgic reasons, I’m really quite enjoying this book, which harks back to a long-forgotten supporting cast and a long-abandoned interpretation of Apocalypse. I suspect if I didn’t have that attachment to the source material, I’d be crawling up the walls at some of this stuff – it’s one of those comics where humanoid robots have “visual input sensors” instead of “eyes”, and where characters stay stuff like “Apocalypse? Only he could be so diabolical as to combine the Master Mold and Hodge into a single being!” In other words, it is, in some respects, rather crap. But loveably so, and in an authentically late-eighties way. And in its favour, it’s got a completely loopy robot for the heroes to fight, and there’s a jittery energy to Dan Panosian’s art which I genuinely like a lot. I’m enjoying it; if you don’t remember the original, you might not.
X-Men Forever #21 – In this issue: a convoluted macguffin is explained! Also, Claremont goes a little further into last issue’s big revelation that Iron Man is the bad guy. A little disappointingly, he seems to be already setting up the idea that it’s all a feint and that he’s infiltrating them, or something to that effect. That’s a shame, since I quite liked the idea of doing a story in X-Men Forever that was manifestly impossible in the real Marvel Universe, by gleefully wrecking the cast of another book. In many ways, Iron Man’s ideally suited to be the well-intentioned anti-mutant superhero, particularly in his Civil War-era version. Anyway, this is largely a set-up issue as everyone sits around delivering exposition to one another, in preparation for the climax of the first year. But it’s building well enough, and the pay-off should be good fun. A fortnightly book can get away with this sort of issue. (Be honest: is there any book that wouldn’t be improved by a more frequent schedule?)
X-Men: Pixie Strikes Back #2 – I actually missed this when it came out, so let’s cover it now. Issue #1 had a nice enough set-up, but this one just gets a bit confusing – is Blindfold with the others or not? Are they in a dream or in the real San Francisco? Yes, I realise that we’re meant to be asking ourselves what on earth is going on, but the plot here is so murky that it’s hard to get a sense of what exactly the drama is supposed to be. I recall having similar issues with Kathryn Immonen’s Hellcat mini. Maybe I’m just slow. There are some good moments in here, and I really like Sara Pichelli’s art, which gives the characters a real sense of life, and provides a suitably off-kilter tone to Pixie’s scenes. As a story, though, I’m not sure it works.
The Blindfold with the other girls is obviously an impostor or an illusion (it’s been a while since I read it, but I remember a scene with a mirror where she’s completely different from the others).
“given that Diamond are usually unable to get their heads round a bank holiday, I don’t see them overcoming a volcanic dust cloud.”
Beautiful.
You DO realise the reason Diamond can’t “get around a bank holiday” is just because they’re CLOSED on bank holidays, and that simply delays things by a day, right?
I think the idea is that Diamond should be anticipating bank holidays being that they are on a calendar, not letting them affect the schedule like Diamond currently does.
There’s really only one chapter of Second Coming out next week, X-Men Legacy. The X-Factor issue is tangential to the big story at best. Which, as a reader of X-Factor, I’m in full approval of.
“Be honest: is there any book that wouldn’t be improved by a more frequent schedule?”
That’s a tricky question, actually.
Even assuming it would be possible to increase the frequency of a given series without adjusting its quality, I don’t think something like WATCHMEN or ALL STAR SUPERMAN would have profited from coming out over, say, six months each.
These books may be largely read as paperbacks and hardcovers now, but I think it’s well worth remembering that they were made to work pretty well as single-issue comic books, too. In other words, the gaps in-between issues can enhance the story; they SHOULD enhance the story if it’s released as a serial, in fact.
That said, most books are not WATCHMEN or ALL STAR SUPERMAN, of course, but something I’m increasingly missing is the art of making a good, monthly serial that’s literally “worth the wait.”
no matter how well a series works in single issues, weekly would still read better than monthly. it keeps the momentum up. tv-episodes also come out weekly, and there is arguably more story in a 40 min episode than in a 22 page issue.
In regards to Black Widow’s ongoing status, I’d say they need to reevaluate the way they market and label new series in general. Does every new series need to be ‘ongoing’? Not every series needs a set number of issues (they can evolve) but when nearly every series ends up being a miniseries or maxiseries anyway, why not be realistic about it?
Of course, Marvel has basically trained me to not buy mini-series in single issues. Almost every mini is now $3.99 an issue and the trades usually come out the month after the series ends. So I stopped buying all but the most essential minis (just cosmic books for my taste). But I often lose interest by the time the trade is coming out so I end up avoiding most Marvel minis these days.
Anyway, I’ll pick up Black Widow as long as Acuna is on art and maybe it’ll last longer than 5 issues.
I’ll buy Black Widow as long as Acuña’s on art, but there isn’t much else that’s keeping me interested.
I just read “The Unwritten”…
1) Gotta say, I think Mark Millar’s “The Unfunnies” was a better version of this story, if you’re going to tell it at all.
2) On the other hand, I enjoyed it more once I started reading it as an exercise in putting the ‘warren’ into Warren Ellis.
Good god, no. Unfunnies is what you get if you have the germ of the same idea and no subtlety whatsoever.
The funniest thing about the New Mutants issue is how they make such a big deal about how much the odds are stacked against Sam’s team, and then when it’s actually time to go against the Right they are able to handily defeat a large percentage of the bad guys without breaking a sweat. Until the point where Hodge enters the fight they’re doing pretty good, which is kind of funny in that I guess not even the writers can really take the Right very seriously.
The Flash doesn’t keep getting relaunched due to lack of reader interest, but to constant editorial flip-flopping. First they want Bart as the Flash, then they realize that’s not a good idea and bring back Wally, then Dan DiDio decides he wants to bring Barry back. So I don’t think they need to let interest build, and I imagine this new series will do quite well. I certainly enjoyed it.
The problem with the Flash and all the characters in Brightest Day is that we really don’t have reason to care about any of them. Johns is usually good at giving readers reason to care about the characters he likes SO MUCH, YOU GUYS, but lately he’s been struggling. And to tell the truth, while he’s the made Green Lantern universe much more interesting, Hal Jordan is still a boring character after more than 50 issues.
Robert, I’d say the editorial flip-flops were definitely following on the heels of declining sales. Letting interest build doesn’t usually seem to work without something to attract short-term interest, though multiple changes of Flash in such a short time is perhaps too much short-termism.
Michael, doesn’t the Green Lantern universe feel that much easier to detach from its supposed main character than, say, the Batman universe or the Superman universe?
Am I the only one who frequently bursts out laughing at this latest stage of what spamming has turned into? It’s almost nonsense poetry. Someone should collect it into a book.
Greetings.
To start with
I want to say that I really like
your website,
just determined it last week but I
have been reading
it ever
since then.
I appear to consent with most of the views and opinions and this submit
is no exception.
entirely
Thank you
to get a fantastic website and I
hope you keep up
the very good function.
If you do I will continue
to read it.
Have a great
day.
In case anyone’s wondering, I delete spam posts that make it through the filter. We actually get quite a lot of them, but mostly on older posts. As a rule, if it’s a comment by somebody I’ve never heard of with no content beyond telling me how great I am and a link to a suspiciously specific blog, I delete them. If you do in fact have a suspiciously specific blog and wish to tell me how great I am, please make sure to include some reference to precisely why I am so awesome, in order that I can know you are not automated. Anyone else who wants to tell me precisely why I am awesome is equally free to do so.
Well, you log in to HtA while I’m at work so I never see most of the spam, and that’s definitely awesome.
(I remember getting one on, I think, my War of Kings post, and as I was reading it I was thinking “Wow, this person’s really effusive, they really like… heyyy… damn you, Spammy!”)
Ever read that sidebar on Ellis’ site? One of the altblogs that feeds it has either been hijacked by a spamborg or they’ve started just chucking the words Viagra Ciallis Overdrive into their blogposts in place of regular nouns.
//\oo/\\
Are you entirely sure Viagra Ciallis Overdrive isn’t the name of Ellis’ next series?
Dang, I picked a bad time to try and pimp my new suspiciously specific blog.
I always find it a little odd when the villains use the incredibly specific devices that target heroes’ weaknesses against heroes who don’t have Superman-level invulnerability.
“The weaponised ritual cannon shell was incredbily expensive, but it’ll be worth it if you manage to hit Magik with it!”
“Sir, if we can hit her with the weaponised ritual shell, we could hit her with a regular cannon shell instead…”
“Ah, but if we hit her with the ritual shell, she won’t be able to teleport!”
“If we hit her with a regular shell she won’t be able to telepot either, sir. Also she’ll be dead.”
“Look, if we don’t use this thing Bastion’s going to cut our supply budget next quarter…”
I haven’t read any of The Unwritten, and indeed only have a vague idea of the premise, but your review of this issue makes it sound something akin to Jasper Fforde’s Thursday Next series.
Is this assessment fair?
“The weaponised ritual cannon shell was incredbily expensive, but it’ll be worth it if you manage to hit Magik with it!”
“Sir, if we can hit her with the weaponised ritual shell, we could hit her with a regular cannon shell instead…”
“Ah, but if we hit her with the ritual shell, she won’t be able to teleport!”
“If we hit her with a regular shell she won’t be able to telepot either, sir. Also she’ll be dead.”
“Look, if we don’t use this thing Bastion’s going to cut our supply budget next quarter…”
Brilliant.
@clay
There’s some similiarities. I think the key difference is this. The Unwritten is looking at how [some] fiction affects reality (e.g. Harry Potter, Kipling’s pro-Empire stories, Nazi propaganda films etc.), and how that reflects on the fiction, in Carey’s fictional metafiction. Thursday Next is about a series where ALL ‘good’ (for a certain reasonable definition of good/literary) fiction has had this much influence, and how this affects reality and fictional metafiction. Along with timetravel. And the continuation of the Crimean War. And Welsh violent seperatism.
Which is to say that Unwritten’s a lot more focussed, and is about the effects of the effects of fiction on reality on the fiction, and doesn’t through too much alternate insanity in — the one fictional fictional series in The Unwritten is Tommy Taylor, which is pretty much a clear Harry Potter stand in.
(Hopefully this doesn’t sound too much like a more insane Grant Morrison plot.)
Morrison wishes he could come up with something as oddball as the Thursday Next books.
Anyway, I’ve enjoyed Carey’s work since Lucifer, so maybe I’ll check this out.
One thing I’d like to add to Jonny K’s excellent comparison is that they’re also very different tonally; Thursday Next is filled with puns and tongue-in-cheek humor, whereas the Unwritten is a lot darker, using black comedy, when it’s got any sort of comedy at all.
His latest book Shades of Grey is rather darker. But still stark raving mad.
I have to disagree with you on the Black Widow series. Maybe it’s just because I’m a fan, but strategically, if you’re going to launch a Black Widow series, now is the time, not only because of the movie, but because she’s appeared as a supporting character in a number of recent series for the past two years (Captain America, Invincible Iron Man,Thunderbolts). And they did test the water with two recent minis, so I assume they know what they’re doing. And they have their whole “Women of Marvel” thing going, gimmick as it may be.
“…so I assume they know they’re doing…”
This is the company who have given for prolonged periods, high profile books to Daniel Way, Jeph Loeb, Frank Tieri, and Chuck Austin. I don’t think that’s a safe assumption.
I’m inclined to agree… especially with the antics Quesada, Brevoort, and some of their other editorial staff seem to insist on having and pushing (“Let’s restart the rivalry with DC, guys! Let’s insult our fans’ intelligence and actual hobbies!”)
Anyway, I’m hoping Black Widow can really make it, especially since Marvel has no women led books at the moment since they canceled Ms. Marvel, Spider-girl, and She-hulk. I did question how Marjorie wrote those doctors though. That took unrealistic and pushed it 5 paces beyond it.
Anyone else find it sad that Claremont’s X-men Forever is only 10+ issues away from bypassing Astonishing X-men’s issue count in not even half the time?